0 of 31 questions completed
Questions:
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading…
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You must first complete the following:
0 of 31 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0)
Earned Point(s): 0 of 0, (0)
0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0)
For questions 1-8, read the text below and decide which answer (A,B,C or D) best fits each gap.
Whale watching as an organised activity dates back to 1950 when the Cabrillo National Monument in San Diego was (1) ……………. a public spot for the observation of Gray Whales. In 1955 the first water-based whale watching com- menced in the same area, and customers were charged $1 per trip to view the whales at closer quarters. The spectacle (2) ……………. popular, attracting 10,000 visitors in its first year and many more in subsequent years. The industry spread throughout the western coast of the United States over the following decade.
In the late 1970s the industry mushroomed in size (3) ……………. to operations in New England. By 1985 more visitors watched whales from New England than California. The rapid growth in this area has been (4) ……………. to the rela- tively dense population of Humpback Whales, whose acrobatic behaviour, such as breaching (jumping out of the water) and tail-slapping, was an obvious crowd-pleaser, and the close proximity of whale populations to the large cities on the east (5) ……………. of the US.
Throughout the 1980s and 1990s whale watching spread throughout the world. In 1998 Erich Hoyt (6) ……………. out the largest systematic study of whale watching yet undertaken and concluded that whale watching trips were available in 87 countries around the world, with over 9 million participants generating a(n) (7) ……………. to whale watcher opera- tors and supporting infrastructure of over one billion dollars. His estimate for 2020 was for 11.3m participants spending $1.475bn, representing a five-fold increase over the decades. Whale watching is of particular importance to developing countries as coastal communities start to profit directly from the whales’ presence, significantly (8) ……………. to popular support for the full protection of these animals from any resumption of commercial whaling.
Whale watching as an organised activity (0) ……………. back to 1950 when the Cabrillo National Monument in San Diego was (I) {[dedicated][destined][declared|1][denied]}……………. a public spot for the observation of Gray Whales. In 1955 the first water-based whale watching commenced in the same area, and customers were charged $1 per trip to view the whales at closer quarters. The spectacle (2) {[dedicated][destined][declared][denied]}……………. popular, attracting I0,000 visitors in its first year and many more in subsequent years. The industry spread throughout the western coast of the United States over the following decade.
In the late 1970s the industry mushroomed in size (3) ……………. to operations in New England. By 1985 more visitors watched whales from New England than California. The rapid growth in this area has been (4) ……………. to the rela- tively dense population of Humpback Whales, whose acrobatic behaviour, such as breaching (jumping out of the water) and tail-slapping, was an obvious crowd-pleaser, and the close proximity of whale populations to the large cities on the east (5) ……………. of the US.
Throughout the 1980s and 1990s whale watching spread throughout the world. In 1998 Erich Hoyt (6) ……………. out the largest systematic study of whale watching yet undertaken and concluded that whale watching trips were available in 87 countries around the world, with over 9 million participants generating a(n) (7) ………….. .. to whale watcher opera- tors and supporting infrastructure of over one billion dollars. His estimate for 2020 was for I 1.3m participants spending $1.475bn, representing a five-fold increase over the decades. Whale watching is of particular importance to developing countries as coastal communities start to profit directly from the whales’ presence, significantly (8) ……………. to popular support for the full protection of these animals from any resumption of commercial whaling.
For questions 1-8, read the text below and decide which answer (A,B,C or D) best fits each gap.
Whale watching as an organised activity dates back to 1950 when the Cabrillo National Monument in San Diego was (1) ……………. a public spot for the observation of Gray Whales. In 1955 the first water-based whale watching com- menced in the same area, and customers were charged $1 per trip to view the whales at closer quarters. The spectacle (2) ……………. popular, attracting 10,000 visitors in its first year and many more in subsequent years. The industry spread throughout the western coast of the United States over the following decade.
In the late 1970s the industry mushroomed in size (3) ……………. to operations in New England. By 1985 more visitors watched whales from New England than California. The rapid growth in this area has been (4) ……………. to the rela- tively dense population of Humpback Whales, whose acrobatic behaviour, such as breaching (jumping out of the water) and tail-slapping, was an obvious crowd-pleaser, and the close proximity of whale populations to the large cities on the east (5) ……………. of the US.
Throughout the 1980s and 1990s whale watching spread throughout the world. In 1998 Erich Hoyt (6) ……………. out the largest systematic study of whale watching yet undertaken and concluded that whale watching trips were available in 87 countries around the world, with over 9 million participants generating a(n) (7) ……………. to whale watcher opera- tors and supporting infrastructure of over one billion dollars. His estimate for 2020 was for 11.3m participants spending $1.475bn, representing a five-fold increase over the decades. Whale watching is of particular importance to developing countries as coastal communities start to profit directly from the whales’ presence, significantly (8) ……………. to popular support for the full protection of these animals from any resumption of commercial whaling.
For questions 9-16, read the text below and think of the word which best fits each gap.
Use only one word in each gap.
The name Oberon got its literary start in the first half of the 13th century from the fairy dwarf Oberon (9) helps the hero in the chanson de geste, titled “Les Prouesses et faitz du noble Huon de Bordeaux”. When Huon, son of Seguin count of Bordeaux, passed (I0) the forest where he (Oberon) lives, he was warned against Oberon by a hermit, but his sense of courtesy had him answer Oberon’s greet- ings, and (II) gain Oberon’s aid in his quest: (12) . killed Chariot, the Emperor’s son, in self-defense, Huon must visit the court of the amir of Babylon and perform various feats to win a par- don, and only with Oberon’s aid (13) he succeed.
The real Seguin was Count of Bordeaux under Louis the Pious in 839, and died fighting against the Normans in 845. Charles !’Enfant, a son of Charles the Bald, died in 866 (14) wounds inflicted by a certain Aubouin in the circumstances of an ambush similar to that carried out by Chariot in the story. Thus Oberon appears in a I 3th centu- ry French courtly fantasy that is based (15) a shred of 9th century fact. He is given some Celtic trappings, (16) as a magical cup that is ever-full for the virtuous: “The magic cup supplied their evening meal; for such was its virtue that it afforded not only wine, but more solid fare when desired”.
For questions 1-8, read the text below and decide which answer (A,B,C or D) best fits each gap.
Whale watching as an organised activity dates back to 1950 when the Cabrillo National Monument in San Diego was (1) ……………. a public spot for the observation of Gray Whales. In 1955 the first water-based whale watching com- menced in the same area, and customers were charged $1 per trip to view the whales at closer quarters. The spectacle (2) ……………. popular, attracting 10,000 visitors in its first year and many more in subsequent years. The industry spread throughout the western coast of the United States over the following decade.
In the late 1970s the industry mushroomed in size (3) ……………. to operations in New England. By 1985 more visitors watched whales from New England than California. The rapid growth in this area has been (4) ……………. to the rela- tively dense population of Humpback Whales, whose acrobatic behaviour, such as breaching (jumping out of the water) and tail-slapping, was an obvious crowd-pleaser, and the close proximity of whale populations to the large cities on the east (5) ……………. of the US.
Throughout the 1980s and 1990s whale watching spread throughout the world. In 1998 Erich Hoyt (6) ……………. out the largest systematic study of whale watching yet undertaken and concluded that whale watching trips were available in 87 countries around the world, with over 9 million participants generating a(n) (7) ……………. to whale watcher opera- tors and supporting infrastructure of over one billion dollars. His estimate for 2020 was for 11.3m participants spending $1.475bn, representing a five-fold increase over the decades. Whale watching is of particular importance to developing countries as coastal communities start to profit directly from the whales’ presence, significantly (8) ……………. to popular support for the full protection of these animals from any resumption of commercial whaling.
For questions 1-8, read the text below and decide which answer (A,B,C or D) best fits each gap.
Whale watching as an organised activity dates back to 1950 when the Cabrillo National Monument in San Diego was (1) ……………. a public spot for the observation of Gray Whales. In 1955 the first water-based whale watching com- menced in the same area, and customers were charged $1 per trip to view the whales at closer quarters. The spectacle (2) ……………. popular, attracting 10,000 visitors in its first year and many more in subsequent years. The industry spread throughout the western coast of the United States over the following decade.
In the late 1970s the industry mushroomed in size (3) ……………. to operations in New England. By 1985 more visitors watched whales from New England than California. The rapid growth in this area has been (4) ……………. to the rela- tively dense population of Humpback Whales, whose acrobatic behaviour, such as breaching (jumping out of the water) and tail-slapping, was an obvious crowd-pleaser, and the close proximity of whale populations to the large cities on the east (5) ……………. of the US.
Throughout the 1980s and 1990s whale watching spread throughout the world. In 1998 Erich Hoyt (6) ……………. out the largest systematic study of whale watching yet undertaken and concluded that whale watching trips were available in 87 countries around the world, with over 9 million participants generating a(n) (7) ……………. to whale watcher opera- tors and supporting infrastructure of over one billion dollars. His estimate for 2020 was for 11.3m participants spending $1.475bn, representing a five-fold increase over the decades. Whale watching is of particular importance to developing countries as coastal communities start to profit directly from the whales’ presence, significantly (8) ……………. to popular support for the full protection of these animals from any resumption of commercial whaling.
For questions 1-8, read the text below and decide which answer (A,B,C or D) best fits each gap.
Whale watching as an organised activity dates back to 1950 when the Cabrillo National Monument in San Diego was (1) ……………. a public spot for the observation of Gray Whales. In 1955 the first water-based whale watching com- menced in the same area, and customers were charged $1 per trip to view the whales at closer quarters. The spectacle (2) ……………. popular, attracting 10,000 visitors in its first year and many more in subsequent years. The industry spread throughout the western coast of the United States over the following decade.
In the late 1970s the industry mushroomed in size (3) ……………. to operations in New England. By 1985 more visitors watched whales from New England than California. The rapid growth in this area has been (4) ……………. to the rela- tively dense population of Humpback Whales, whose acrobatic behaviour, such as breaching (jumping out of the water) and tail-slapping, was an obvious crowd-pleaser, and the close proximity of whale populations to the large cities on the east (5) ……………. of the US.
Throughout the 1980s and 1990s whale watching spread throughout the world. In 1998 Erich Hoyt (6) ……………. out the largest systematic study of whale watching yet undertaken and concluded that whale watching trips were available in 87 countries around the world, with over 9 million participants generating a(n) (7) ……………. to whale watcher opera- tors and supporting infrastructure of over one billion dollars. His estimate for 2020 was for 11.3m participants spending $1.475bn, representing a five-fold increase over the decades. Whale watching is of particular importance to developing countries as coastal communities start to profit directly from the whales’ presence, significantly (8) ……………. to popular support for the full protection of these animals from any resumption of commercial whaling.
For questions 1-8, read the text below and decide which answer (A,B,C or D) best fits each gap.
Whale watching as an organised activity dates back to 1950 when the Cabrillo National Monument in San Diego was (1) ……………. a public spot for the observation of Gray Whales. In 1955 the first water-based whale watching com- menced in the same area, and customers were charged $1 per trip to view the whales at closer quarters. The spectacle (2) ……………. popular, attracting 10,000 visitors in its first year and many more in subsequent years. The industry spread throughout the western coast of the United States over the following decade.
In the late 1970s the industry mushroomed in size (3) ……………. to operations in New England. By 1985 more visitors watched whales from New England than California. The rapid growth in this area has been (4) ……………. to the rela- tively dense population of Humpback Whales, whose acrobatic behaviour, such as breaching (jumping out of the water) and tail-slapping, was an obvious crowd-pleaser, and the close proximity of whale populations to the large cities on the east (5) ……………. of the US.
Throughout the 1980s and 1990s whale watching spread throughout the world. In 1998 Erich Hoyt (6) ……………. out the largest systematic study of whale watching yet undertaken and concluded that whale watching trips were available in 87 countries around the world, with over 9 million participants generating a(n) (7) ……………. to whale watcher opera- tors and supporting infrastructure of over one billion dollars. His estimate for 2020 was for 11.3m participants spending $1.475bn, representing a five-fold increase over the decades. Whale watching is of particular importance to developing countries as coastal communities start to profit directly from the whales’ presence, significantly (8) ……………. to popular support for the full protection of these animals from any resumption of commercial whaling.
For questions 1-8, read the text below and decide which answer (A,B,C or D) best fits each gap.
Whale watching as an organised activity dates back to 1950 when the Cabrillo National Monument in San Diego was (1) ……………. a public spot for the observation of Gray Whales. In 1955 the first water-based whale watching com- menced in the same area, and customers were charged $1 per trip to view the whales at closer quarters. The spectacle (2) ……………. popular, attracting 10,000 visitors in its first year and many more in subsequent years. The industry spread throughout the western coast of the United States over the following decade.
In the late 1970s the industry mushroomed in size (3) ……………. to operations in New England. By 1985 more visitors watched whales from New England than California. The rapid growth in this area has been (4) ……………. to the rela- tively dense population of Humpback Whales, whose acrobatic behaviour, such as breaching (jumping out of the water) and tail-slapping, was an obvious crowd-pleaser, and the close proximity of whale populations to the large cities on the east (5) ……………. of the US.
Throughout the 1980s and 1990s whale watching spread throughout the world. In 1998 Erich Hoyt (6) ……………. out the largest systematic study of whale watching yet undertaken and concluded that whale watching trips were available in 87 countries around the world, with over 9 million participants generating a(n) (7) ……………. to whale watcher opera- tors and supporting infrastructure of over one billion dollars. His estimate for 2020 was for 11.3m participants spending $1.475bn, representing a five-fold increase over the decades. Whale watching is of particular importance to developing countries as coastal communities start to profit directly from the whales’ presence, significantly (8) ……………. to popular support for the full protection of these animals from any resumption of commercial whaling.
For questions 1-8, read the text below and decide which answer (A,B,C or D) best fits each gap.
Whale watching as an organised activity dates back to 1950 when the Cabrillo National Monument in San Diego was (1) ……………. a public spot for the observation of Gray Whales. In 1955 the first water-based whale watching com- menced in the same area, and customers were charged $1 per trip to view the whales at closer quarters. The spectacle (2) ……………. popular, attracting 10,000 visitors in its first year and many more in subsequent years. The industry spread throughout the western coast of the United States over the following decade.
In the late 1970s the industry mushroomed in size (3) ……………. to operations in New England. By 1985 more visitors watched whales from New England than California. The rapid growth in this area has been (4) ……………. to the rela- tively dense population of Humpback Whales, whose acrobatic behaviour, such as breaching (jumping out of the water) and tail-slapping, was an obvious crowd-pleaser, and the close proximity of whale populations to the large cities on the east (5) ……………. of the US.
Throughout the 1980s and 1990s whale watching spread throughout the world. In 1998 Erich Hoyt (6) ……………. out the largest systematic study of whale watching yet undertaken and concluded that whale watching trips were available in 87 countries around the world, with over 9 million participants generating a(n) (7) ……………. to whale watcher opera- tors and supporting infrastructure of over one billion dollars. His estimate for 2020 was for 11.3m participants spending $1.475bn, representing a five-fold increase over the decades. Whale watching is of particular importance to developing countries as coastal communities start to profit directly from the whales’ presence, significantly (8) ……………. to popular support for the full protection of these animals from any resumption of commercial whaling.
For questions 9-16, read the text below and think of the word which best fits each gap.
Use only one word in each gap.
The name Oberon got its literary start in the first half of the 13th century from the fairy dwarf Oberon (9) helps the hero in the chanson de geste, titled “Les Prouesses et faitz du noble Huon de Bordeaux”. When Huon, son of Seguin count of Bordeaux, passed (I0) the forest where he (Oberon) lives, he was warned against Oberon by a hermit, but his sense of courtesy had him answer Oberon’s greet- ings, and (11) gain Oberon’s aid in his quest: (12) . killed Chariot, the Emperor’s son, in self-defense, Huon must visit the court of the amir of Babylon and perform various feats to win a par- don, and only with Oberon’s aid (13) he succeed. The real Seguin was Count of Bordeaux under Louis the Pious in 839, and died fighting against the Normans in 845. Charles !’Enfant, a son of Charles the Bald, died in 866 (14) wounds inflicted by a certain Aubouin in the circumstances of an ambush similar to that carried out by Chariot in the story. Thus Oberon appears in a I 3th century French courtly fantasy that is based (15) a shred of 9th century fact. He is given some Celtic trappings, (16) as a magical cup that is ever-full for the virtuous: “The magic cup supplied their evening meal; for such was its virtue that it afforded not only wine, but more solid fare when desired”.
For questions 17-24, read the text below. Use the word given in capitals at the end of some of the lines to form a word that fits in the gap in the same line.
The major rationale cited for smoking bans is the protection of workers, in particular, from the harmful effects of second-hand smoke, which include an increased risk of heart disease, cancer, emphysema and other chronic and acute diseases. Laws implementing bans on indoor smoking have been introduced by many countries in (17) VARY forms over the years, with legislators citing scientific evidence that shows tobacco smoking is often (18) HARM to the smokers themselves and to those inhaling second-hand smoke. Such laws may reduce health care costs in the short term but do not account for the increased health care cost of an ever ageing population. However, consequent improvements in worker productivity and lower overall labour costs make the “smoke-free” community more (19) ATTRACT for bringing new jobs into the area and keeping current jobs and employers there. In Indiana, USA, for example, the state’s economic development agency wrote into its plan for (20) ACCELERATE of economic growth that it encourages cities and towns to adopt local smoke-free workplace laws as a means of promoting job growth in communities. (21) ADD rationales for smoking restrictions include: reduced risk of fire in areas with (22) EXPLODE hazards or where (23) FLAME materials are handled and cleanliness in places where food or pharmaceuticals, semiconductors or precision instruments and machinery are produced. Also, the cancellation of many previously (24) ENJOY events due to rising insurance costs.
For questions 25-30, complete the second sentence so that it has a similar meaning to the first sentence, using the word given. Do not change the word given. You must use between three and six words, including the word given.
More than fifty guests came to the party. SHOWED
More than fifty guests (25) the party.
I’d help you, but I have very little free time on my hands. HARDLY
I’d help you, but I (26) free time on my hands.
He’s still planning on attending as far as I know. KNOWLEDGE
To (27) , he is still planning on attending.
it’s no use trying to convince her to go. POINT
There’s (28) to convince her to go.
Women outnumber men by two to one on the art course. TWICE
There (29) men on the art course.
I can’t promise that you will get the job. GUARANTEE
There (30) will get the job.
You are going to read a magazine article. For questions 31-36, choose the answer (A, B, C or D) which you think fits best according to the text.
You don’t have to be a biologist or an anthropologist to see how closely the great apes – gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos and orangutans – resemble us. Even a child can see that their bodies are pretty much the same as ours, apart from some exaggerated proportions and extra body hair. Apes have dexterous hands much like ours but unlike those of any other creature. And, most striking of all, their faces are uncannily expressive, showing a range of emotions that are eerily familiar. That’s why we delight in seeing chimps wearing tuxedos, playing the drums or riding bicycles. it’s why a potbellied gorilla scratching itself in the zoo reminds us of Uncle Ralph or Cousin Vinnie; and why, in a more unsettled reaction, Queen Victoria, on seeing an orangutan named Jenny at the London Zoo in 1842, declared the beast “frightful and painfully and disagreeably human.”
lt isn’t just a superficial resemblance. Chimps, especially, not only look like us, they also share with us some human-like behaviours. They make and use tools and teach those skills to their offspring. They prey on other animals and occasionally murder each other. They have complex social hierarchies and some aspects of what anthropologists consider culture. They can’t form words, but they can learn to communicate via sign language and symbols and to perform complex cognitive tasks. Scientists figured out decades ago that chimps are our nearest evolutionary cousins, roughly 98%to 99%identical to humans at the genetic level. When it comes to DNA, a human is closer to a chimp than a mouse is to a rat.
Yet tiny differences, sprinkled throughout the genome, have made all the difference. Agriculture, language, art, music, technology and philosophy – all the achievements that make us profoundly different from chimpanzees and make a chimp in a business suit seem so deeply ridiculous – are somehow encoded within minute fractions of our genetic code. Nobody yet knows precisely where they are or how they work, but somewhere in the nuclei of our cells are handfuls of amino acids, arranged in a specific order, that endow us with the brainpower to outthink and outdo our closest relatives on the tree of life. They give us the ability to speak and write and read, to compose symphonies, paint masterpieces and delve into the molecular biology that makes us what we are.
Until recently, there was no way to unravel these crucial differences. Exactly what gives us advantages like complex brains and the ability to walk upright, and certain disadvantages, including susceptibility to a particular type of malaria, AIDS and Alzheimer’s, diseases that don’t seem to afflict chimps, remained a mystery.
But that’s rapidly changing. Just a year ago, geneticists announced that they had sequenced a rough draft of the chimpanzee genome, allowing the first side-by-side comparisons of human and chimpanzee DNA. Already, that research has led to important discoveries about the development of the human brain over the past few million years and possibly about our ancestors’ mating behaviour as well.
And sometime in the next few weeks, a team led by molecular geneticist Svante Pobo of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology , in Leipzig, Germany, will announce an even more stunning achievement: the sequencing of a significant fraction of the genome of Neanderthals – the human-like species we picture when we hear the word caveman – who are far closer to us genetically than chimps are. And though Neanderthals became extinct tens of thousands of years ago, Pobo is convinced he’s on the way to reconstructing the entire genome of that long- lost relative, using DNA extracted, against all odds, from a 38,000-year-old bone.
Laid side by side, these three sets of genetic blueprints – plus the genomes of gorillas and other primates, which are already well on the way to being completely sequenced – will not only begin to explain precisely what makes us human but could lead to a better understanding of human diseases and how to treat them.
(31) What is something apes do NOT do that humans do?
You are going to read a magazine article. For questions 31-36, choose the answer (A, B, C or D) which you think fits best according to the text.
You don’t have to be a biologist or an anthropologist to see how closely the great apes – gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos and orangutans – resemble us. Even a child can see that their bodies are pretty much the same as ours, apart from some exaggerated proportions and extra body hair. Apes have dexterous hands much like ours but unlike those of any other creature. And, most striking of all, their faces are uncannily expressive, showing a range of emotions that are eerily familiar. That’s why we delight in seeing chimps wearing tuxedos, playing the drums or riding bicycles. it’s why a potbellied gorilla scratching itself in the zoo reminds us of Uncle Ralph or Cousin Vinnie; and why, in a more unsettled reaction, Queen Victoria, on seeing an orangutan named Jenny at the London Zoo in 1842, declared the beast “frightful and painfully and disagreeably human.”
lt isn’t just a superficial resemblance. Chimps, especially, not only look like us, they also share with us some human-like behaviours. They make and use tools and teach those skills to their offspring. They prey on other animals and occasionally murder each other. They have complex social hierarchies and some aspects of what anthropologists consider culture. They can’t form words, but they can learn to communicate via sign language and symbols and to perform complex cognitive tasks. Scientists figured out decades ago that chimps are our nearest evolutionary cousins, roughly 98%to 99%identical to humans at the genetic level. When it comes to DNA, a human is closer to a chimp than a mouse is to a rat.
Yet tiny differences, sprinkled throughout the genome, have made all the difference. Agriculture, language, art, music, technology and philosophy – all the achievements that make us profoundly different from chimpanzees and make a chimp in a business suit seem so deeply ridiculous – are somehow encoded within minute fractions of our genetic code. Nobody yet knows precisely where they are or how they work, but somewhere in the nuclei of our cells are handfuls of amino acids, arranged in a specific order, that endow us with the brainpower to outthink and outdo our closest relatives on the tree of life. They give us the ability to speak and write and read, to compose symphonies, paint masterpieces and delve into the molecular biology that makes us what we are.
Until recently, there was no way to unravel these crucial differences. Exactly what gives us advantages like complex brains and the ability to walk upright, and certain disadvantages, including susceptibility to a particular type of malaria, AIDS and Alzheimer’s, diseases that don’t seem to afflict chimps, remained a mystery.
But that’s rapidly changing. Just a year ago, geneticists announced that they had sequenced a rough draft of the chimpanzee genome, allowing the first side-by-side comparisons of human and chimpanzee DNA. Already, that research has led to important discoveries about the development of the human brain over the past few million years and possibly about our ancestors’ mating behaviour as well.
And sometime in the next few weeks, a team led by molecular geneticist Svante Pobo of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology , in Leipzig, Germany, will announce an even more stunning achievement: the sequencing of a significant fraction of the genome of Neanderthals – the human-like species we picture when we hear the word caveman – who are far closer to us genetically than chimps are. And though Neanderthals became extinct tens of thousands of years ago, Pobo is convinced he’s on the way to reconstructing the entire genome of that long- lost relative, using DNA extracted, against all odds, from a 38,000-year-old bone.
Laid side by side, these three sets of genetic blueprints – plus the genomes of gorillas and other primates, which are already well on the way to being completely sequenced – will not only begin to explain precisely what makes us human but could lead to a better understanding of human diseases and how to treat them.
(32) A mouse and a rat are mentioned
You are going to read a magazine article. For questions 31-36, choose the answer (A, B, C or D) which you think fits best according to the text.
You don’t have to be a biologist or an anthropologist to see how closely the great apes – gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos and orangutans – resemble us. Even a child can see that their bodies are pretty much the same as ours, apart from some exaggerated proportions and extra body hair. Apes have dexterous hands much like ours but unlike those of any other creature. And, most striking of all, their faces are uncannily expressive, showing a range of emotions that are eerily familiar. That’s why we delight in seeing chimps wearing tuxedos, playing the drums or riding bicycles. it’s why a potbellied gorilla scratching itself in the zoo reminds us of Uncle Ralph or Cousin Vinnie; and why, in a more unsettled reaction, Queen Victoria, on seeing an orangutan named Jenny at the London Zoo in 1842, declared the beast “frightful and painfully and disagreeably human.”
lt isn’t just a superficial resemblance. Chimps, especially, not only look like us, they also share with us some human-like behaviours. They make and use tools and teach those skills to their offspring. They prey on other animals and occasionally murder each other. They have complex social hierarchies and some aspects of what anthropologists consider culture. They can’t form words, but they can learn to communicate via sign language and symbols and to perform complex cognitive tasks. Scientists figured out decades ago that chimps are our nearest evolutionary cousins, roughly 98%to 99%identical to humans at the genetic level. When it comes to DNA, a human is closer to a chimp than a mouse is to a rat.
Yet tiny differences, sprinkled throughout the genome, have made all the difference. Agriculture, language, art, music, technology and philosophy – all the achievements that make us profoundly different from chimpanzees and make a chimp in a business suit seem so deeply ridiculous – are somehow encoded within minute fractions of our genetic code. Nobody yet knows precisely where they are or how they work, but somewhere in the nuclei of our cells are handfuls of amino acids, arranged in a specific order, that endow us with the brainpower to outthink and outdo our closest relatives on the tree of life. They give us the ability to speak and write and read, to compose symphonies, paint masterpieces and delve into the molecular biology that makes us what we are.
Until recently, there was no way to unravel these crucial differences. Exactly what gives us advantages like complex brains and the ability to walk upright, and certain disadvantages, including susceptibility to a particular type of malaria, AIDS and Alzheimer’s, diseases that don’t seem to afflict chimps, remained a mystery.
But that’s rapidly changing. Just a year ago, geneticists announced that they had sequenced a rough draft of the chimpanzee genome, allowing the first side-by-side comparisons of human and chimpanzee DNA. Already, that research has led to important discoveries about the development of the human brain over the past few million years and possibly about our ancestors’ mating behaviour as well.
And sometime in the next few weeks, a team led by molecular geneticist Svante Pobo of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology , in Leipzig, Germany, will announce an even more stunning achievement: the sequencing of a significant fraction of the genome of Neanderthals – the human-like species we picture when we hear the word caveman – who are far closer to us genetically than chimps are. And though Neanderthals became extinct tens of thousands of years ago, Pobo is convinced he’s on the way to reconstructing the entire genome of that long- lost relative, using DNA extracted, against all odds, from a 38,000-year-old bone.
Laid side by side, these three sets of genetic blueprints – plus the genomes of gorillas and other primates, which are already well on the way to being completely sequenced – will not only begin to explain precisely what makes us human but could lead to a better understanding of human diseases and how to treat them.
(33) Scientists
You are going to read a magazine article. For questions 31-36, choose the answer (A, B, C or D) which you think fits best according to the text.
You don’t have to be a biologist or an anthropologist to see how closely the great apes – gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos and orangutans – resemble us. Even a child can see that their bodies are pretty much the same as ours, apart from some exaggerated proportions and extra body hair. Apes have dexterous hands much like ours but unlike those of any other creature. And, most striking of all, their faces are uncannily expressive, showing a range of emotions that are eerily familiar. That’s why we delight in seeing chimps wearing tuxedos, playing the drums or riding bicycles. it’s why a potbellied gorilla scratching itself in the zoo reminds us of Uncle Ralph or Cousin Vinnie; and why, in a more unsettled reaction, Queen Victoria, on seeing an orangutan named Jenny at the London Zoo in 1842, declared the beast “frightful and painfully and disagreeably human.”
lt isn’t just a superficial resemblance. Chimps, especially, not only look like us, they also share with us some human-like behaviours. They make and use tools and teach those skills to their offspring. They prey on other animals and occasionally murder each other. They have complex social hierarchies and some aspects of what anthropologists consider culture. They can’t form words, but they can learn to communicate via sign language and symbols and to perform complex cognitive tasks. Scientists figured out decades ago that chimps are our nearest evolutionary cousins, roughly 98%to 99%identical to humans at the genetic level. When it comes to DNA, a human is closer to a chimp than a mouse is to a rat.
Yet tiny differences, sprinkled throughout the genome, have made all the difference. Agriculture, language, art, music, technology and philosophy – all the achievements that make us profoundly different from chimpanzees and make a chimp in a business suit seem so deeply ridiculous – are somehow encoded within minute fractions of our genetic code. Nobody yet knows precisely where they are or how they work, but somewhere in the nuclei of our cells are handfuls of amino acids, arranged in a specific order, that endow us with the brainpower to outthink and outdo our closest relatives on the tree of life. They give us the ability to speak and write and read, to compose symphonies, paint masterpieces and delve into the molecular biology that makes us what we are.
Until recently, there was no way to unravel these crucial differences. Exactly what gives us advantages like complex brains and the ability to walk upright, and certain disadvantages, including susceptibility to a particular type of malaria, AIDS and Alzheimer’s, diseases that don’t seem to afflict chimps, remained a mystery.
But that’s rapidly changing. Just a year ago, geneticists announced that they had sequenced a rough draft of the chimpanzee genome, allowing the first side-by-side comparisons of human and chimpanzee DNA. Already, that research has led to important discoveries about the development of the human brain over the past few million years and possibly about our ancestors’ mating behaviour as well.
And sometime in the next few weeks, a team led by molecular geneticist Svante Pobo of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology , in Leipzig, Germany, will announce an even more stunning achievement: the sequencing of a significant fraction of the genome of Neanderthals – the human-like species we picture when we hear the word caveman – who are far closer to us genetically than chimps are. And though Neanderthals became extinct tens of thousands of years ago, Pobo is convinced he’s on the way to reconstructing the entire genome of that long- lost relative, using DNA extracted, against all odds, from a 38,000-year-old bone.
Laid side by side, these three sets of genetic blueprints – plus the genomes of gorillas and other primates, which are already well on the way to being completely sequenced – will not only begin to explain precisely what makes us human but could lead to a better understanding of human diseases and how to treat them.
(34) Compared to apes, human behaviour is more
You are going to read a magazine article. For questions 31-36, choose the answer (A, B, C or D) which you think fits best according to the text.
You don’t have to be a biologist or an anthropologist to see how closely the great apes – gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos and orangutans – resemble us. Even a child can see that their bodies are pretty much the same as ours, apart from some exaggerated proportions and extra body hair. Apes have dexterous hands much like ours but unlike those of any other creature. And, most striking of all, their faces are uncannily expressive, showing a range of emotions that are eerily familiar. That’s why we delight in seeing chimps wearing tuxedos, playing the drums or riding bicycles. it’s why a potbellied gorilla scratching itself in the zoo reminds us of Uncle Ralph or Cousin Vinnie; and why, in a more unsettled reaction, Queen Victoria, on seeing an orangutan named Jenny at the London Zoo in 1842, declared the beast “frightful and painfully and disagreeably human.”
lt isn’t just a superficial resemblance. Chimps, especially, not only look like us, they also share with us some human-like behaviours. They make and use tools and teach those skills to their offspring. They prey on other animals and occasionally murder each other. They have complex social hierarchies and some aspects of what anthropologists consider culture. They can’t form words, but they can learn to communicate via sign language and symbols and to perform complex cognitive tasks. Scientists figured out decades ago that chimps are our nearest evolutionary cousins, roughly 98%to 99%identical to humans at the genetic level. When it comes to DNA, a human is closer to a chimp than a mouse is to a rat.
Yet tiny differences, sprinkled throughout the genome, have made all the difference. Agriculture, language, art, music, technology and philosophy – all the achievements that make us profoundly different from chimpanzees and make a chimp in a business suit seem so deeply ridiculous – are somehow encoded within minute fractions of our genetic code. Nobody yet knows precisely where they are or how they work, but somewhere in the nuclei of our cells are handfuls of amino acids, arranged in a specific order, that endow us with the brainpower to outthink and outdo our closest relatives on the tree of life. They give us the ability to speak and write and read, to compose symphonies, paint masterpieces and delve into the molecular biology that makes us what we are.
Until recently, there was no way to unravel these crucial differences. Exactly what gives us advantages like complex brains and the ability to walk upright, and certain disadvantages, including susceptibility to a particular type of malaria, AIDS and Alzheimer’s, diseases that don’t seem to afflict chimps, remained a mystery.
But that’s rapidly changing. Just a year ago, geneticists announced that they had sequenced a rough draft of the chimpanzee genome, allowing the first side-by-side comparisons of human and chimpanzee DNA. Already, that research has led to important discoveries about the development of the human brain over the past few million years and possibly about our ancestors’ mating behaviour as well.
And sometime in the next few weeks, a team led by molecular geneticist Svante Pobo of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology , in Leipzig, Germany, will announce an even more stunning achievement: the sequencing of a significant fraction of the genome of Neanderthals – the human-like species we picture when we hear the word caveman – who are far closer to us genetically than chimps are. And though Neanderthals became extinct tens of thousands of years ago, Pobo is convinced he’s on the way to reconstructing the entire genome of that long- lost relative, using DNA extracted, against all odds, from a 38,000-year-old bone.
Laid side by side, these three sets of genetic blueprints – plus the genomes of gorillas and other primates, which are already well on the way to being completely sequenced – will not only begin to explain precisely what makes us human but could lead to a better understanding of human diseases and how to treat them.
(35) Neanderthals
You are going to read a magazine article. For questions 31-36, choose the answer (A, B, C or D) which you think fits best according to the text.
You don’t have to be a biologist or an anthropologist to see how closely the great apes – gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos and orangutans – resemble us. Even a child can see that their bodies are pretty much the same as ours, apart from some exaggerated proportions and extra body hair. Apes have dexterous hands much like ours but unlike those of any other creature. And, most striking of all, their faces are uncannily expressive, showing a range of emotions that are eerily familiar. That’s why we delight in seeing chimps wearing tuxedos, playing the drums or riding bicycles. it’s why a potbellied gorilla scratching itself in the zoo reminds us of Uncle Ralph or Cousin Vinnie; and why, in a more unsettled reaction, Queen Victoria, on seeing an orangutan named Jenny at the London Zoo in 1842, declared the beast “frightful and painfully and disagreeably human.”
lt isn’t just a superficial resemblance. Chimps, especially, not only look like us, they also share with us some human-like behaviours. They make and use tools and teach those skills to their offspring. They prey on other animals and occasionally murder each other. They have complex social hierarchies and some aspects of what anthropologists consider culture. They can’t form words, but they can learn to communicate via sign language and symbols and to perform complex cognitive tasks. Scientists figured out decades ago that chimps are our nearest evolutionary cousins, roughly 98%to 99%identical to humans at the genetic level. When it comes to DNA, a human is closer to a chimp than a mouse is to a rat.
Yet tiny differences, sprinkled throughout the genome, have made all the difference. Agriculture, language, art, music, technology and philosophy – all the achievements that make us profoundly different from chimpanzees and make a chimp in a business suit seem so deeply ridiculous – are somehow encoded within minute fractions of our genetic code. Nobody yet knows precisely where they are or how they work, but somewhere in the nuclei of our cells are handfuls of amino acids, arranged in a specific order, that endow us with the brainpower to outthink and outdo our closest relatives on the tree of life. They give us the ability to speak and write and read, to compose symphonies, paint masterpieces and delve into the molecular biology that makes us what we are.
Until recently, there was no way to unravel these crucial differences. Exactly what gives us advantages like complex brains and the ability to walk upright, and certain disadvantages, including susceptibility to a particular type of malaria, AIDS and Alzheimer’s, diseases that don’t seem to afflict chimps, remained a mystery.
But that’s rapidly changing. Just a year ago, geneticists announced that they had sequenced a rough draft of the chimpanzee genome, allowing the first side-by-side comparisons of human and chimpanzee DNA. Already, that research has led to important discoveries about the development of the human brain over the past few million years and possibly about our ancestors’ mating behaviour as well.
And sometime in the next few weeks, a team led by molecular geneticist Svante Pobo of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology , in Leipzig, Germany, will announce an even more stunning achievement: the sequencing of a significant fraction of the genome of Neanderthals – the human-like species we picture when we hear the word caveman – who are far closer to us genetically than chimps are. And though Neanderthals became extinct tens of thousands of years ago, Pobo is convinced he’s on the way to reconstructing the entire genome of that long- lost relative, using DNA extracted, against all odds, from a 38,000-year-old bone.
Laid side by side, these three sets of genetic blueprints – plus the genomes of gorillas and other primates, which are already well on the way to being completely sequenced – will not only begin to explain precisely what makes us human but could lead to a better understanding of human diseases and how to treat them.
(36) The purpose of this research
You are going to read four reviews of a ballet. For questions 37-40, choose from reviews A-D. The reviews may be chosen more than once.
37. like reviewer A, remains unconvinced of the dancers’ portrayal of the passion between Romeo and Juliet?
You are going to read four reviews of a ballet. For questions 37-40, choose from reviews A-D. The reviews may be chosen more than once.
38. like reviewer C, had eagerly anticipated Osipova’s performance, only to be disappointed in some way?
You are going to read four reviews of a ballet. For questions 37-40, choose from reviews A-D. The reviews may be chosen more than once.
39. disagrees with the other three reviewers, in finding Osipova’s performance faultless?
You are going to read four reviews of a ballet. For questions 37-40, choose from reviews A-D. The reviews may be chosen more than once.
40. compares and contrasts this rendering with past performances of Romeo and Juliet?
You are going to read an extract from a novel. Choose from the paragraphs A-G the one which fits each gap (41-46). There is one extra paragraph which you do not need to use.
A. Parked here and there were various spacecraft. The taxis could enter the atmosphere in an emergency, but they were not designed to make the return trip to space. The delta-winged landers which would make multiple journeys down to the surface of Journey’s End were too large to store inside the Santiago; they were attached instead to the outside of the ship and there was almost no way to see them unless you worked on one of the external work crews, as his mother had done before her death.
B. There was no hesitation; no questioning his authority. The taxi answered him instantly, lights flicking on; cock- pit door craning open. Steam was beginning to vent from ports spaced along the vehicle’s side, and Sky could hear the growing whine of turbines somewhere inside the machine’s angular hull. He hesitated at the door, until his father beckoned that he lead. “After you, Sky. Go and take the seat on the right of the instrument column. Don’t touch anything while you’re about it.”
C. Titus said nothing, but the point could not be denied. Sky had never been in the freight bay before; not even during one of the illicit trips with Constanza. Sky remembered the time she had taken him to see the dolphins, and the punishment that had ensued, and how that punishment had been eclipsed by the ordeal that had followed; the flash of light and the period he had spent trapped alone and cold in the utter darkness of the nursery. It seemed so long ago now, but there were still things that he did not fully understand. No one would speak of that day when the whole ship had turned dark and cold, yet to Sky the events were still clearly fixed in his memory.
D. His father settled into the seat next to him. The door had closed on them now, and suddenly it was quieter, save for the continuous rasp of the taxi’s air-circulation. His father touched the green display with his finger, making it change, studying the results with narrow-eyed concentration.
E. “I used to, once.” His father eased the joystick forward now and the taxi commenced gliding along its departure track, sliding past the parked ranks of other vehicles. “But machines aren’t infallible. We used to kid our- selves that they were because it was the only way to stay sane in a place like this, where we depend on them for our every breath. Unfortunately it was never true.”
F. The spacecraft had some technical difficulty upon it’s take-off. Titus and Sky jolted precariously as their taxi struggled to break through the atmosphere. Sky could feel his body begin to tremble with fear, but focused all his energy preventing that from happening. He did not dare let his father see him being anything but brave.
G. Eventually, when something like normal shipboard life had returned, Sky managed to sneak back into the nursery. The room was lit, but everything else looked more or less as he had left it; Clown frozen in that distorted shape he had assumed after the flash. Sky had crept closer to examine his friend. Clown had been a kind of moving picture that only made sense when seen from precisely Sky’s point of view. Clown had seemed to be physically present in the room – not just painted on the wall . For three years, Sky had never doubted that Clown was in some sense real. Yet his parents had given up responsibility to an illusion.
Ten years old, he moved with his father across the curved polished floor of the freight bay, their booted feet squeaking on the high-gloss surface; the two of them suspended above their own dark reflections; a man and a boy forever walking up what looked to the eye like an ever steepening hill, but which always felt perfectly level.
“We’re going outside, aren’t we,” Sky said.
Titus looked down at his son. “Why do you assume that?”
“You wouldn’t have brought me here otherwise.”
41.
After what seemed like days, the adults had made the main lights come on again. He noticed the air-circulators began to work again. All that time, his father told him later, they had been breathing unrecirculated air; slowly turning staler and staler as the hundred and fifty waking humans dumped more and more carbon dioxide back into their atmosphere. It soon would have started caus- ing serious problems, but the air became fresher and the ship slowly warmed back up until it was possible to move along the corridors without shivering. The food improved, but Sky had hardly noticed that they had been eating emergency rations during the black-out.
42.
Now however – in a mood of eager forgiveness – he pushed such thoughts from his mind; awed by the sheer size of the freight bay and the prospect of what lay ahead. What made the place seem all the larger was the fact that the two of them were quite alone. The rest of the chamber was suggested rather than clearly seen; its dimensions only hinted at by the dark.
43.
Titus halted near one of the small shuttles. “Yes,” he said, “we’re going outside. I think it’s time you saw things the way they really are.”
“What things?”
But by way of answer Titus only elevated the cuff of his uniform and spoke quietly into his bracelet. “Enable excursion vehicle 15.”
44.
Sky hopped into the spacecraft, feeling the floor vibrat- ing beneath his feet. The taxi was considerably more cramped inside than it had appeared it would be – the hull thickly plated and armoured – and he had to duck to reach his seat, brushing his head against a gristle-like tangle of internal pipework. He fiddled with the blue- steel buckle until he had it tight across his chest. In front of him was a cool turquoise green display — con- stantly changing numbers and intricate diagrams.
45.
“Word of advice, Sky. Never trust these damned things to tell you that they’re safe. Make sure for yourself.” “You don’t trust machines to tell you?”
46.
“What happened to change your mind?” “You’ll see, shortly.”
You are going to read some articles written by different football players. For questions 47 – 56, choose from the articles (A-E). The articles may be chosen more than once.
47. started playing the sport only because his/her parents insisted?
48. didn’t surprise people with his/her talent?
49. got injured frequently?
50. was involved in many activities?
51. is grateful for the attention?
52. didn’t enjoy a major victory?
53. decided against fame and glory?
54. demonstrated leadership off the field?
55. doesn’t deny a lack of talent?
56. was a member of a brand new team?
A. I started playing football seriously at a very young age. I played on teams all year long. But even that wasn’t enough. When my dad would get home from work, we’d pass the ball back and forth until supper. As I got older, I’d invite my three best friends to come over to my house. They didn’t really like football, but we had an agreement; I’d give them a snack, we’d watch a little TV, then we would play. One against three, and if I won, they had to play me again. During university I had a chance to try-out for a professional team in Germany and I thought, ‘this is my chance to really make my dreams come true.’ Yet, when I arrived in Germany, I couldn’t shake the feeling that I had made a huge mistake. To make a long story short, I made the team, but turned them down and returned home. I had realised that my dream wasn’t all I had built it up to be. I had imagined the glory of that life, but what I failed to consider was the fact that I would be doing it all alone, without my family and friends. So, I came home, finished university, and began coaching football. I love my job, and I still get to play foot- ball. It’s more fun now than it’s ever been.
B. I come from a family of footballers. My dad played in competitive leagues all his life and my mum was on the national team. Needless to say, I began playing football at about the same time I began to walk. I played on the top teams since the age of thirteen. I was always the best on my team by far but, considering my background, that was expected. My parents were very committed to my football career and on some level I am very grateful. However, at times, their zeal was a little overwhelming. It was always in my head that I was playing football mostly to please my parents, which really stripped the joy of the game from me. I still remember when my team won the biggest youth tournament in the nation. All my teammates were crying with joy and were so proud; I was just happy the tournament was over so I could go home and be with my friends. That’s when I realised that while I may have the talent for the game, I didn’t have the passion for it. So at age 16 I told my parents I didn’t want to play anymore. I couldn’t believe how support- ive they were. I guess I put most of the pressure on myself.
C. Football was always just one of my extra-curricular activities. I was president of my class at school, a member of the school orchestra, on the debate team, and in the autumn, I played football. I was a decent player, but definite- ly not the best. Tactics weren’t my strength, but I was tough! It was always a joke that I chose to go through other players, rather than around them. Of course, that aggressiveness didn’t come without consequences. I left many games covered in bruises and blood, but the worst came the summer before my final year in high school when I was seriously injured and had to have knee surgery. I was devastated because I was supposed to be team captain that year and I was afraid they were going to take the title away from me. Luckily, I still got to be captain and I really loved my role from the sideline. I worked hard at my thera- py and was able to play in the last game of the season, which was great, but I had learned that my talents are best used on the sideline. I’ve been coaching youth teams for five years now.
D. My parents were tired of me doing nothing but play video games so one day they said I was starting foot- ball practice. I protested a bit, but I knew my efforts would be worthless. My parents are unmovable. I have always hated exercise. I admit it. I am lazy. I went to practice pre- pared with multiple excuses to sit on the sidelines. I was getting the flu, I twisted my ankle, I was asthmatic. Yet, when I got there, I could tell by the look of the coach that he wasn’t the kind of man who put up with excuses. There was something in his presence that told me he meant business. So I played the whole practice. And I really was the most awkward one out there. I never learned to love that game, but being on a team had some perks; at the end of every game some parent brought snacks. The snacks were undoubtedly the best part. I stuck with football until high school then became involved with the school newspaper, which really suits me better, considering I am not the world’s best athlete.
E. I’ve been a professional footballer for fifteen years now. That may seem like a lot considering my age, but older generations of women did not have the opportunity to play as youths. So when England decided to start its first women’s national team, they had to recruit from a younger age group. The first five years were quite difficult. The team had basically no money. We stayed in cheap motel rooms or set up mats on gymnasium floors when we travelled. For a long time, despite our success, we had no fans, no news coverage, nothing. It was definitely frustrating, but I also believe it is a huge testament to our love of the game. We didn’t play for the glory or the fame. We played because we loved it. This is not to say we are not enjoying the recent attention being focused on our team; it is sure nice to finally be recognised, praised and admired for our hard work and talent. We have been through so much together, I feel like my teammates are my family. I work hard mainly because I know I owe it to them. And we sup- port each other and encourage each other when one of us has made a mistake or is having a tough time getting through training. I’m a better player and person because of my teammates.
You must answer this question. Write your answer in 220-260 words in an appropriate style.
1. You have listened to the radio programme about what kind of facilities should receive planning permission to be built on the seafront of a seaside town. You have made the notes below:
What kind of facilities should be allowed to be built on the seafront of a seaside town?
Some opinions expressed in the discussion:
“More open space is needed and not big hotels.” “Sports facilities are always welcome.”
“New hotels can provide jobs to local people.”
Write an essay discussing two of the facilities in your notes.
You should explain which facility should receive planning permission to be built on the seafront, giving reasons in support of your answer.
You may, if you wish, make use of the opinions expressed in the discussion, but you should use your own words as far as possible.
This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.
Write an answer to one of the questions 2-4 in this part. Write your answer in 220-260 words in an appropriate style.
2. You are reading a local newspaper editorial where the publication argues that the citizens of the city should pay higher taxes to help fund the building of new facilities to host the Olympic Games. You disagree with this idea and write a letter to the editor explaining your reasons.
You argue that the hard economic times have made it difficult for people to live and more taxes now would only increase their burden. You don’t see the value after the Olympic Games are over, and, moreover, you are against all the traffic and noise that will result from the new construction.
Write your letter. You do not need to include postal addresses.
3. You see the following announcement on a TV series reviews website:
TV Reviews Wanted
Send us a review of your favourite TV series. In your review try to explore the characters, the plot, and the setting. Also explain why you found it interesting to watch and what you think is its best feature.
Write your review.
4. For a political science class you are taking, the professor asks you to conduct a small survey of students to learn more about their voting habits in elections of local officials.
The professor asks that you create a report organising the data you collect on:
Write your report.
This response will be reviewed and graded after submission.
You will hear three different extracts. For questions 1-6, choose the answer (A, B or C) which fits best according to what you hear. There are two questions for each extract.
You will hear a discussion in which a man talks to his good friend about her upcoming trip.
A was a last minute decision.
B was John’s suggestion.
C was considered for a few months.
Answer 1
A is to take a break from the stress of work.
B is to give her a change of pace.
C is to spend time with her family.
Answer 2
You will hear a conversation where two friends discuss the restaurant they just left.
A she liked the elaborate environment.
B she has bad taste in food.
C she was so hungry she would have eaten anything.
A they just ate and are not hungry.
B it would make them late for the show.
C their clothes would make them noticeable.
Answer 4
You will hear part of an interview with a medical student.
A was forced on him.
B was made using the same criteria most people use.
C was a poor one, but it’s too late to change now.
Answer 5
A does not give good financial reward.
B involves frequent night shifts.
C has a family-friendly schedule.
Answer 6
You will hear a freelancing Graphic Designer called Alec Zaki talking about how he came into his career. For questions 7-14, complete the sentences.
Although Alec has worked for other companies, he likes being
7.
In order to maximise his possibility of success, Alec became an expert in a variety of
8. .
There have been some corporate jobs that Alec has done
9. for.
Alec created 3D virtual sets for a show that featured
10. computer game releases.
The TV show took place on
11. that resembled a game controller.
Unlike 12. Alec entered the field by way of television.
Alec wanted to stand out in college because he was
13. than the other students.
Alec is now a freelancer because of
14.
You will hear part of a radio interview in which professional golfer, Amy Hartman, is being interviewed. For questions 15-20, choose the answer (A, B, C or D), which fits best according to what you hear.
A. She had the most talent for golf.
B. She realised she could play golf for longer.
C She had no success in the other sports.
D It was her favourite sport.
Answer 15:
A. never
B. fairly often
D. she ate them often as a child, but does not anymore
Answer 16:
A. her coaches
B. her dedication to her sport
C. superstitions
A. She never has any free time.
B. She spends a lot of time with her pet.
C. She’s always watching DVDs.
D. She never gets bored.
Answer 18:
A. She doesn’t depend on anything for luck.
B. She didn’t know the answer to a question.
C. She didn’t win a tournament she was expected to win.
D. She hasn’t updated her profile.
Answer 19:
A. Is one of the youngest golfers in the sport.
B. will have a long career.
C. started golfing later in life than the other girls.
D. will make it to the LPGA Tour.
Answer 20:
You will hear five short extracts in which people are talking about their job in transport.
While you listen you must complete both tasks.
For questions 21-25, choose from the list A-H the form of transport that the speaker is talking about.
For questions 26-30, choose from the list A-H what each speaker is expressing.
—